Experiment
To study percentage-biased differential protection of a power transformer under healthy, external-fault, internal-fault and magnetizing-inrush conditions.
Aim
Simulate the currents supplied by CTs on both sides of a transformer, calculate differential and bias currents, and determine whether the numerical differential relay remains stable or issues a trip.
Learning outcomes
- Differentiate internal and external transformer faults.
- Explain the need for percentage bias.
- Study the effects of CT error, CT saturation and tap mismatch.
- Use second-harmonic restraint during magnetizing inrush.
Stability
The relay should remain restrained for load current and external faults.
Sensitivity
The relay should trip rapidly for internal winding and earth faults.
Security
Second-harmonic restraint should prevent unwanted tripping during inrush.
Theory
Differential principle
CTs are installed on the high-voltage and low-voltage sides. After ratio and phase compensation, the relay compares the two secondary currents.
Differential current: Iop = |I1 − I2| for through current.
Bias current: Ibias = (|I1| + |I2|)/2.
Percentage bias
The operating threshold increases with bias current. This improves stability when high external-fault current causes unequal CT errors or CT saturation.
Operate when: Iop > Ipickup + Slope × Ibias.
Second-harmonic inrush restraint
Transformer energization may produce a large differential current without an internal fault. Magnetizing inrush typically contains significant second-harmonic content. A numerical relay can block differential tripping when the second-harmonic percentage exceeds a selected threshold.
Model basis and assumptions
- Transformer rated currents are calculated from S/(√3V), and the entered CT ratios convert primary currents to 5 A relay-secondary quantities.
- With numerical compensation enabled, both winding currents are referred to a common 5 A per-unit base and the entered tap mismatch is corrected.
- Healthy and external-fault cases use equal through-current on both transformer sides; internal faults use user-selected in-zone source contributions that add in the differential element.
- CT saturation is represented as a reduction in one CT's fundamental-current magnitude. It is a teaching approximation, not a transient CT waveform model.
- The relay decision uses a continuous dual-slope percentage-bias characteristic and optional second-harmonic blocking. Manufacturer-specific operating time is intentionally not predicted.
Pre-Test
Transformer Differential Zone
Procedure
Observation Table
| Case | Transformer | CT ratios | Scenario | I1 (A) | I2 (A) | Iop (A) | Ibias (A) | Threshold (A) | Margin (A) | H2 (%) | Compensation | Decision | Reason |
|---|
Post-Test
Result and Conclusion
Suggested result statement
The percentage-biased differential relay remained stable during healthy and moderate external-fault conditions, operated for internal transformer faults, and was prevented from unwanted operation during magnetizing inrush by second-harmonic restraint. Numerical ratio and tap compensation reduced false differential current caused by CT-ratio and tap mismatch.